Assembling 3-layer design.
2011-04-16 Build Session Report
Up to overall project info
Attendees: Adam, Clark, Ratha, Tobias.
Session photos
Goals
- Build two full modules of
the 3-layer
plywood design and join them in the water.
- Evaluate feasibility and identify remaining design gaps.
Testing flotation.
Results
The team reached consensus that the layered plywood design is
adequately rigid and stable. One more prototyping session is needed to
choose between two layers of 3/4" plywood vs. three layers of
1/2" plywood. The flotation is definitely adequate and we will go
ahead with the lids as the attachment method.
Lessons learned:
- Organizer must ensure snacks and drinks are available for the crew
and make sure we stay fueled and hyrated.
- My Subaru is really not supposed to carry 350 lbs on its
roof. From this point on we may need to beg, borrow, or rent a
truck.
Oof. Heavy.
Remaining problems to solve:
- The weight of the assembled module (150lb) is formidable. We
needed 3 people to carry it, and even then it was a struggle. Handling
15 modules this way would be a difficult task.
- Getting a finished module into the water, especially without
partially submerging it (which runs the risk of getting water into the
flotation), was a challenge. We had some luck using 2x4s cantilevered
out from the dock, but that may not work on a houseboat. Getting the
platform out of the water shouldn't be so bad since we can deconstruct
it and all the pieces basically float.
- The size of the finished module being larger than 4'x8' means it
will be difficult to transport the platform. It means we pretty much
have to move up from a pickup truck to a box truck.
Other findings:
- Due to friction, the 3-layer design could not be pulled together
on the water as tightly as I was able to do it in my test
(design drawing
- photo). This
meant there was more weakness in the joint than anticipated, even
though the joint strength was still acceptable. Considering this, we
may be able to use 2 layers in 3/4" plywood thickness instead of
3 layers of 1/2" plywood, which we can expect would be equally
rigid and heavy, easier to assemble in the water, slightly cheaper
($40 vs. $45), and probably no weaker in the joint. We need to test
this to ensure the joint really is adequate.
- We tested some double-stick foam tape as sealant. We found it did
help as insurance against water in the flotation bins, but we disliked
the one-time use aspect. Clark will research using old bicycle
innertubes as gaskets. NB: The group has agreed that we do not want to
use anything liquid such as silicone caulk sealant, because of (a)
mess, and (b) decreased reusability.
- We tried eschewing the bin lids and attaching the bins directly to
the plywood with wood screws. This was more resistant to taking on
water, especially with the foam tape sealant, and so added peace of
mind. However, consensus found that the additional trouble of
wood-screwing the bins on at launch time (as opposed to snapping them
on to pre-attached lids) would not be worth the additional
benefit.
Contact: ratha@ratha.com